All shows / Before It Was News

Before It Was News cover art

Before It Was News

Egypt Outdrew Spain: When the Volume Chart Lies

A World Cup longshot that never cleared half a percent drew more trading volume than the champion, and the most trusted number on the screen turns out to be the least checked.

Nadia and Miles · 22 min · 26 Oct 2026

FactUnion VerifiedEvery fact on the episode's fact sheet was checked against its sources. Wrong facts were corrected. What this meansFacts checked 25 Oct 2026

Chapters (9)

About this episode

On Polymarket's international exchange, CNBC reported that a hundred and fifty-eight million dollars traded on Egypt winning the World Cup, a team whose odds never crossed half a percent. Spain, which won the final, drew a hundred and fifty-two million. Nadia and Miles test four explanations against each other: wash trading, as estimated by a Columbia network study; skilled traders correcting mispriced longshots, which is Polymarket's explanation; the way multi-outcome markets and volume are counted; and plain noise.

Then they follow a line CNBC almost threw away: the pattern reportedly doesn't show up on Polymarket's US exchange. That changes the question from what the crowd knew about Egypt to what is different about the venue, and how the number was counted. Kalshi and Polymarket both deny wash trading, and the episode reads their side in full. Nothing in this episode is trading advice. It ends with what would settle the question, not a forecast.

Hosted by Nadia and Miles, performed by synthetic voices. Supported by STELQ.

Facts and sources

Every fact used in this episode, with the sources it was checked against. Download as data

175 of 175 recorded lines matched the checked script.

  1. CNBC reported on Sept. 30, 2026 that on Polymarket international’s sports contracts, $158 million traded on Egypt’s odds to win the World Cup, odds that never crossed 0.5%, versus $152 million on eventual winner Spain.

  2. CNBC added that Spain’s volume was slightly smaller than Morocco’s, and that Morocco never had a greater than 2% chance.

  3. CNBC said a September analysis found the low-odds volume pattern wasn’t detectable on 2028 presidential nominee contracts on Polymarket’s US exchange.

  4. Polymarket head of revenue and analytics Kyle Gesuelli told CNBC that low-odds contract activity is driven by highly active ‘sharps’ finding mispricing, not wash trading, and said: “It’s actually healthy for markets because it brings pricing imbalances back into balance.”

  5. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on CNBC’s ‘Squawk on the Street’ on Sept. 23, 2026: “We have a zero tolerance policy when it comes to any sort of manipulative trading, including wash trading, insider trading, or fraud in our markets.”

Show all 26 factsShow fewer facts

  1. CNBC wrote that the Wall Street Journal reported the CFTC is examining trades on Kalshi’s ether perpetual future contract; CNBC could not independently verify that, and a CFTC spokesperson said the agency doesn’t confirm or deny matters related to investigations.

  2. After an unnamed user on X flagged the pattern on Sept. 20, CNBC found that nearly half of that day’s dollar volume on Kalshi’s ether perpetuals came from trades sized between $5,495 and $5,505.

  3. Kalshi denied any wash trading on its platform, and spokesperson Jack Such said Kalshi has “zero concerns” about the ratio of daily volume to resting liquidity.

  4. Ulm University’s Andre Guettler wrote in a working paper: “To the extent that a material share of reported perpetual volume is manufactured... headline volume and its trajectory may overstate the underlying trading demand on which such a valuation would rest.”

  5. Tamika Bent of K&L Gates told CNBC exchanges have “a duty to protect market integrity by monitoring market conditions, price movements, and volumes in real time for abnormalities.”

  6. SSRN lists ‘Network-Based Detection of Wash Trading’ as written November 6, 2025.

    Reworded to match its sources. The November 6, 2025 written date is supported by SSRN. The posted and revised dates are not stated in the evidence, and the Columbia passage does not concern this paper's dates.

  7. Fortune reported on Nov. 7, 2025 that the Columbia researchers concluded ‘artificial trading’ averaged 25% of all buying and selling on Polymarket over the previous three years, and that the authors called the figures estimates and did not accuse Polymarket of being responsible.

  8. The study flagged about 14% of 1.26 million wallets, plus 45% of sports volume and 17% of election volume; sports peaked at about 90% in the week of Oct. 21, 2024.

    Kept on a lower-weight source (bitget.com); nothing we found says otherwise.

  9. Co-author Yash Kanoria said: “Wash trading doesn’t add liquidity or information to the market, so it would seem valuable to distinguish authentic from inauthentic volume.”

  10. Kanoria also said in an email, “I’m hopeful that Polymarket will welcome the analysis in our paper,” while a Polymarket representative didn’t have an immediate comment and was reviewing the study.

  11. Rajiv Sethi explained the method: “Wash traders trade with other wash traders in their collusive clique, while market makers neither know nor care who their counterparties are.”

    Kept on a lower-weight source (Substack); nothing we found says otherwise.

  12. Sethi describes a cluster of 200 wallets named MAY (e.g., MAY20, MAY117, MAY175, MAY176) that traded over 116 million shares and more than 113 million in dollar volume at an aggregate loss of $57.86, with purchases followed by sales a tenth of a penny lower around 6pm on a November 1.

    Kept on a lower-weight source (Substack); nothing we found says otherwise.

  13. Paradigm showed that summing all OrderFilled events double-counts Polymarket volume, so a $4.13 sale of YES tokens is recorded as $8.26, and said most dashboards made this mistake.

  14. Polymarket’s developer docs state that in a neg risk event, a No share in any market can be converted into 1 Yes share in every other market.

    Reworded to match its sources. The original omitted the condition. The docs limit this conversion to neg risk events, not all markets.

  15. Converting NO tokens back to pUSD is fee-free apart from gas, whereas selling NO tokens on the open market means paying the bid-ask spread.

    Reworded to match its sources. Single T3 source. It doesn't name the NegRiskAdapter, so that detail is dropped. The gas-only fee and the spread contrast are supported. Kept on a lower-weight source; nothing we found says otherwise.

  16. For a separate analysis of closed markets, CNBC pulled data from Polymarket’s Gamma API, “which counts notional volume on both sides of each trade.”

    Kept on a lower-weight source (Yahoo (mostly republished)); nothing we found says otherwise.

  17. DefiRate reports Polymarket US volume for Sep. 25 to Oct. 24, 2026 two ways: $13.4B in contracts traded versus $3.3B in dollars paid.

    Kept on a lower-weight source (defirate.com); nothing we found says otherwise.

  18. Cardozo and Rivero-Wildemauwe analyzed 588 million Polymarket trades by 2.48 million wallets (Nov. 2022 to Mar. 2026) and found dollar-weighted purchases below 10 cents lost 19.35 cents per dollar with a 95% confidence interval that includes zero, while sports longshots earned positive returns.

  19. Rasooly and Rozzi randomly shocked prices in 817 markets, found effects still visible 60 days later, and found that markets with more traders, greater volume and an external source of probability estimates are harder to manipulate.

  20. About 194,000 unique addresses traded Polymarket’s World Cup winner market, roughly 130,000 of them finished in the red, and Spain beat Argentina 1-0 in the July 19 final.

  21. Polymarket’s docs say on-chain trades, balances and positions are available through analytics platforms including Goldsky, Dune and Allium.

    Kept on a lower-weight source (docs.polymarket.com); nothing we found says otherwise.

Removed during checking (2)

  • The SSRN abstract says wash trading trended up from July 2024, peaked at nearly 60% of Polymarket volume in December 2024, subsided after late April 2025, and returned to about 20% in early October 2025.

    Why it was removed: Reliable sources disagree about this.

  • Polymarket US requires full KYC (government ID, SSN, live selfie, proof of US residency), while the international site requires no identity check for most users; the two run separate order books, and international makers earn rebates.

    Why it was removed: We could not find a public record about this either way.

More from Before It Was News

  1. The Deal That Never Happened

    A prediction market said Ukraine signed a minerals deal it never signed, and the price was never the problem. This episode follows who gets to decide what happened, and why an audit that clears them can't actually clear them.

    19 Oct 2026 · 21 min Facts and sources

  2. The Night Oslo Leaked, and the Night It Didn't

    Two Nobel Peace Prize nights, two identical overnight spikes on Polymarket: one led investigators to a probable hack, the other pointed at nothing.

    13 Oct 2026 · 23 min Facts and sources

If you like Before It Was News, you might also like